Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House concurs with changes to legislative-management structure after heated floor debate
Summary
Representative Christiansen defended HB 220’s adjustments to committee makeup as restoring proportionality; opponents warned the changes would politicize audit and management committees. After debate and a vote to end debate, the House concurred with Senate amendments and passed the bill 44–28.
The Utah House of Representatives voted to concur with Senate amendments to first substitute House Bill 220 (legislative organization amendments) after extended floor debate on March 9.
Representative Christiansen, who moved the concurrence, described the change as restoring ‘‘the principle of proportionality’’ so committee make-up would reflect the membership of the House. ‘‘We will go on and roll on the same way, but, it did accomplish the principle of proportionality,’’ Christiansen said on the floor.
Several members opposed the concurrence, arguing the substitute would introduce a more partisan structure into management and audit subcommittees and could undermine public confidence in audits. One floor speaker said the changes would ‘‘bring us closer to mimicking DC politics’’ and warned that the substitute leaves open the risk of ‘‘partisan staff’’ and partisan recommendations.
After a motion to end debate was adopted and Christiansen gave summation, the House voted to concur with the Senate amendments and the bill passed final passage 44 yes, 28 no. The House placed the motion and returned the bill to the Senate for signature.
Supporters framed the amendment as matching representation to the House’s composition; opponents stressed safeguards for staff and bipartisan deliberation. No formal amendments to HB 220 were adopted on the House floor during this session; the action recorded was the concurrence with Senate amendments and final passage.
