Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Article V Convention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Long floor debate in Utah House over Article V convention resolution; vote opened after motion to end debate
Summary
Lawmakers held a lengthy floor debate on HJR8, a joint resolution calling for a convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. Supporters framed it as a state check on federal power; opponents warned of runaway risk. Motion to end debate passed 54–17; final vote not recorded in provided transcript.
Representatives debated HJR8, a joint resolution calling for an Article V convention to consider amendments that supporters say would impose fiscal restraints, limit federal jurisdiction, and explore term limits for federal officers.
Sponsor Representative Ivory delivered an extended floor statement framing the resolution as a constitutional corrective to federal overreach. "Colleagues, we have the greatest handbook that was ever devised... If in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be changed by an amendment in the way in which the constitution designates," Ivory said.
Proponents (for example, Representatives Powell and Nelson) emphasized procedural safeguards: assemblies of state legislators and restrictive ratification rules that require approval by three‑fourths of the states. Nelson told the body the process is limited in scope and that any proposed amendment would still require ratification by a supermajority.
Opponents raised concerns about scope and unintended consequences. Representative Briscoe and Representative Christensen warned Article V conventions can be unpredictable and posed the risk of sweeping or unforeseen amendments; Briscoe said there is "nothing to prevent" proposals outside the intended remit and described uncertainty about whether proposed changes could be limited.
Representative Grover moved the previous question to end debate; the House recorded a 54–17 vote to adopt the motion to call the question (the two‑thirds threshold was reached). The sponsor gave a summation, and the clerk later opened voting on HJR8. The provided transcript does not include a final roll‑call tally on the joint resolution.
Next steps: Because the captured transcript shows only debate, the motion to end debate and that voting was opened, readers and stakeholders should consult subsequent House proceedings or the House journal for the final disposition of HJR8.
