Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grandparent Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects grandparent-rights bill after debate over retroactivity and parental discretion
Summary
HB 3005 — an amendment intended to allow grandparents of children whose parents’ rights were terminated to petition for visitation — was debated at length over retroactivity, access to courts and potential disruption to finalized adoptions; the House defeated the bill 27–40.
Representative Christiansen moved amendment number 4 to clarify grandparent visitation in the specific context of parental-termination/adoption cases. The amendment added the phrase 'substantial harm' consistent with recent court language and narrowed the retroactivity window (example date referenced: Jan. 1, 2012) to limit the period when petitions could be filed.
Debate focused on multiple concerns: several members said the amendment struck an appropriate balance by narrowing the scope, while others warned the measure could allow terminated parents or relatives back into a child's life, could disrupt settled adoptions, and might disadvantage adoptive parents who lacked the resources to defend against new petitions. Representative Nelson outlined three principal concerns: restored access by terminated parents (via grandparents), retroactive disruption of completed adoptions (reduced but still possible under the bill), and potential serial petitions that could unsettle placement bonds.
Supporters argued the change corrected an inequity and gave judges discretion, applying factors consistent with existing case law (Jones v. Jones was cited on the floor). After debate, amendment number 4 was adopted but the underlying bill failed final passage on a recorded vote of 27 yes to 40 no and was referred for filing.
