Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts amended Mountainous Planning District bill after hours of debate
Summary
The Utah House passed second substitute HB 293, extending and modifying the Mountainous Planning District’s structure and oversight after floor amendments and debate focusing on representation, funding sources and whether the district is linked to federal land-designation efforts. The bill passed 63–12 and will go to the Senate.
Representative Ryan Schultz, the bill sponsor, told colleagues the Mountainous Planning Commission is a recommendation body that improves regional representation for the Central Wasatch Mountains and that the substitute extends the commission’s sunset and adds membership representing residents and property owners ("Like every other planning commission, it recommends land use decisions that are set by the local elected officials," Representative Schultz said.)
An amendment offered under Representative Stratton’s name was moved and adopted after floor discussion. Stratton said the amendment inserts a “coordinating clause” to ensure the sunset functions as intended and adds an oversight or "safety valve" reflecting concerns about governance and transparency.
Representatives raised questions about whether the planning district had authority to impose land-use restrictions, whether it had ties to the Mountain Accord or a pending federal land designation, and how the district was funded. Representative Coleman argued private property owners had been restricted by the 2015 measure and urged a sunset to restore input from affected property owners. Representative Schultz responded repeatedly that the Mountainous Planning Commission is a recommendation-only body and "has nothing to do with the Mountain Accord" and that, to his knowledge, funds supporting the commission come from county planning budgets rather than Mountain Accord grants.
Representative Ivory and others pressed for a funding accounting and for clarity on whether the commission had participated in federal-designation requests; the sponsor said he had no reason to believe the commission had recommended federal designation and that a separate interlocal agreement or the Mountain Accord process handled that. The bill was amended on the floor to add reporting to the Natural Resources Committee and other transparency provisions cited by proponents.
After extended debate about property-rights concerns, local control and the need for regional coordination in the Central Wasatch, the House voted to pass the second substitute as amended. Clerk announcement: "Second substitute House Bill 293, having received 63 yes votes, 12 no votes, passes this body as amended and will be transmitted to the Senate for its consideration." (vote tally recorded by the clerk).
The immediate next step is transmission to the Utah Senate for its consideration; the House sponsor said the commission will still be required to report to the Legislature’s Natural Resources Committee during the bill’s sunset period so the Legislature can revisit or alter the policy based on subsequent oversight and reports.
