Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Payday Lending topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House amends payday-lending law to block refinancing loophole after audit
Summary
On Jan. 25, 2017 the Utah House passed HB 40, amending state payday‑lending law after an audit found lenders were issuing 'new loans' to restart a 10‑week rollover clock; the bill defines 'refinance,' streamlines background checks and limits storefront inspection requirements.
The Utah House of Representatives on Jan. 25 passed HB 40, a package of amendments to the state's check‑cashing and deferred deposit lending laws aimed at closing a refinancing loophole that an audit found had left borrowers trapped in prolonged repayment cycles.
Representative Dawe, the bill sponsor, cited the audit as the impetus for the changes and summarized the problem: "You cannot issue a new loan to refinance an old loan," he said, describing a practice in which some lenders issued what looked to borrowers like rollovers but, on the lender's books, became new loans that restarted a 10‑week limit and allowed repeated rollovers that extended indebtedness for months to a year. The bill explicitly defines "refinance" and prohibits using a new loan as a mechanism to reset the statutory rollover clock.
Beyond that prohibition, HB 40 requires clearer definitions of refinancing, streamlines employee background checks by authorizing use of BCI, reduces the statutory obligation for the Division of Financial Institutions (DFI) to visit every storefront while maintaining entity‑level audit authority, and clarifies DFI's audit and enforcement powers. The sponsor described the changes as targeting the "sleight of hand" the audit uncovered and credited industry engagement and committee work leading to the bill.
A technical amendment (Amendment No. 2) changed a drafting error (the transcript records a one‑word correction to change "commission" to "commissioner"). The amendment was offered under the representative's name and adopted on the floor before the main presentation.
Supporters on the floor framed HB 40 as both consumer protection and reasonable regulation: one lawmaker called it "a long time coming" and said the changes would protect both borrowers and legitimate industry actors. The House voted to pass HB 40, as amended, with 72 yes votes and 0 no votes; the bill will be transmitted to the Senate for its consideration.
What comes next: If the Senate takes up HB 40, further committee review or amendments are possible; the House action transmits the amended bill for Senate consideration.
