Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Udot topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House considers axle-weight rule change and approves Flatiron Harper settlement resolution
Summary
On Sept. 20 the House took up transportation items: Senate Bill 101, which adjusts enforcement discretion for axle-weight variances (leaving permits and fines intact), and Senate Joint Resolution 101, which approves a proposed settlement between UDOT and the Flatiron Harper joint venture over SR‑92 work. The House approved SJR101 (71-0); SB101 was lifted and returned to the Senate for signature.
The House considered two transportation measures on Sept. 20: Senate Bill 101, which adjusts enforcement language for port-of-entry and axle-weight matters to give the Utah Department of Transportation more discretion in minor over-weight situations, and Senate Joint Resolution 101, a joint-resolution approving a proposed settlement agreement between UDOT and the Flatiron Harper joint venture concerning SR‑92 litigation.
Representative Perry, presenting SB101, said the language change allows DOT employees to use discretion for small axle-weight variances (for example, when agricultural haulers can shift loads a short distance to meet limits) while preserving permits and fines for significant or deliberate violations. "We're not getting rid of overweight or oversized permits," he said, adding that permit money and fines will continue to fund road maintenance and penalties for willful violations.
Representative Frower presented SJR101 and described the settlement as a compromise to resolve lengthy litigation. On the floor the sponsor said the proposed resolution would result in a payment to the contractor (described on the floor roughly as $102,000,000), with approximately $11,000,000 set aside for future maintenance and $3,000,000 representing liquidated damages going to UDOT. The sponsor said the settlement would avoid prolonged litigation and save the state an estimated $2.5 million in legal fees and years in court.
The House lifted SB101 under suspension and returned it to the Senate for signature; SJR101 received a floor vote and passed the House 71-0. Sponsors urged that the actions were in the taxpayers' best interest, and they asked members to support the bills to let UDOT continue operations and avoid protracted court proceedings.
