Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Air Quality topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes pilot to retrofit freight switcher locomotives using Volkswagen mitigation funds

Utah House of Representatives · February 23, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House approved HB 211 to fund a pilot retrofitting project for freight switcher locomotives using $2 million in state Volkswagen mitigation funds, paired with federal DERA grants and railroad contributions; supporters said retrofits could sharply cut NOx and PM2.5, while members questioned cost-effectiveness and safeguards to keep retrofitted engines in-state.

The Utah House on Feb. 23 passed House Bill 211, a pilot program to use approximately $2 million of state Volkswagen mitigation funding to retrofit a small number of freight-switcher locomotives, a measure supporters said could sharply reduce localized air pollution.

Representative Handy, sponsor of the bill, told colleagues the proposal would leverage a 40 percent grant under the Diesel Emission Reduction Act and a roughly 25 percent contribution from the railroad to address so-called tier 0 freight switcher engines that run around the clock in rail yards. "Why in the world would we want to give some taxpayer money to a multi billion dollar corporation?" Handy asked rhetorically during his presentation, then framed the plan as a pragmatic partnership to retrofit 2–3 engines that cost about $1 million each and could yield an "89 percent reduction in NOx and PM 2.5" on the units treated.

Supporters described the project as targeted mitigation for localized spikes identified by University of Utah researchers near rail yards including Ogden and the Roper yard. Representative Noel said he was not opposed to the concept but questioned whether the retrofits were the most cost-effective use of funds compared with other air-quality interventions; Handy replied analysts estimated the cost-effectiveness fell within the range of other area-source rules and emphasized the pilot nature of the proposal.

Members pressed the sponsor on safeguards. Representative Albrecht asked what would prevent a railroad from moving retrofitted locomotives to another state; Handy said the bill’s rulemaking language gives the Division of Environmental Quality authority to include requirements intended to keep retrofitted units in Utah when public funds are used, though he acknowledged those measures would be handled in rulemaking rather than written into the bill text.

The House opened and closed voting on the measure; the presiding officer announced HB 211 had received 50 yes votes and 14 no votes and will be transmitted to the Senate for its consideration.

The bill’s next steps include rulemaking by the Division of Environmental Quality to implement program details and any grant agreements with federal programs and participating railroads. The sponsor described HB 211 as a small, science-based first step to address identified pollution spikes while continuing other statewide air-quality efforts.

What happens next: HB 211 will be transmitted to the Utah Senate for its consideration, and implementing rules and grant applications will determine the program’s final scope and eligibility.