Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fees Oversight topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate debates bill to require legislative approval for agency fees; debate tabled after extensive amendments

Utah Senate · February 20, 1990
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate considered substitute Senate Bill 190 to require legislative approval of agency fees and amendments clarifying exclusions and timing; after extended floor debate and several amendments the Senate voted to table the bill for further work.

Senator McAllister opened floor debate on substitute Senate Bill 190, describing it as a concept to require that fees established by state agencies be subject to legislative approval. "This bill proposes that we force upon all the agencies of the state the obligation to have those fees approved," McAllister said, noting the bill's effective date would be delayed until July 1, 1991 to allow time for review and amendment.

Lawmakers pressed on implementation details across agencies. Senators raised concerns that the bill, as written, would affect parks and recreation fee cycles, wildlife restricted accounts, and universities. Senator Finlayson and others urged clarifying language so restricted accounts (for example wildlife accounts holding license fees) would not be inadvertently swept into the general fund; Senator Swan sought amendments clarifying deposits for Pittman-Robinson funds and other federal-aid linked accounts. Multiple floor amendments were proposed and at least some were adopted to exempt specific accounts and clarify the deposit language. Senators emphasized the bill’s philosophical stance while acknowledging many technical changes would be necessary.

After extended questioning about process and the size and timing of the bill, the floor took a division vote on procedural motions. The body then voted to table the bill for further work. "We could spend the rest of the day trying to find all the amendments that would be proposed," McAllister said earlier in debate; the tabling vote reflected a decision to return some issues to committee or the interim process for more detailed drafting.

Next steps: SB190 was tabled by Senate vote for further study and amendment in committee or interim, with sponsors and committee chairs expected to coordinate clarifying changes before resuming floor consideration.