Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves sweeping waste‑management bill with fees, oversight changes
Summary
After extended debate, the Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 255 to revise solid and hazardous waste management, adopt quarterly collection language and impose new per‑ton fees; amendments clarified inventory language and fee timing.
Senate Bill 255, a comprehensive rewrite of state solid and hazardous waste policy, passed the Utah State Senate after detailed floor debate over fees, local control and how waste inventories should be reported.
Senator Reese, sponsor of the bill, explained that the measure is intended to strengthen state oversight of commercial disposal facilities and to make it harder to site new operations that would depend largely on out‑of‑state waste. Reese proposed an amendment to change the method of collection from annual to quarterly; the Senate adopted that amendment. The bill also establishes a fee structure intended to fund state and local planning: a 50¢ per ton fee for solid waste and $2.50 per ton for hazardous waste, with larger application fees for certain commercial facilities.
Several senators questioned operational details. Senator Pendleton and others asked how county plans would account for municipal operations; Reese said counties and cities are able to participate and the bill allows local involvement in planning. Concerns were also raised that a 50¢ per ton fee for solid waste might be too low to discourage out‑of‑state dumping; one senator contrasted that with East Coast charges cited in testimony as high as $80 per ton. Reese and supporters said the fee levels were negotiated with stakeholders and represented an initial, adjustable step.
The Senate adopted a clarifying amendment replacing the word "inventory" with language that the committee "shall determine the type and tonnage of solid waste" to address how reporting would be compiled. After debate and roll‑call procedures, the Senate reported SB 255 passed (reported 24 ayes, 0 nays, 5 absent at the tally shown). Supporters called the bill a "step forward" to give the state tools to plan and avoid becoming a regional dumping ground; critics urged closer review of fee adequacy and local impacts.
The bill was sent to the House for consideration.
The Senate then proceeded to other items on the calendar.
