Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes adoption‑restriction measure after emotional floor debate
Summary
Senate Bill 227, a measure restricting adoption eligibility based on convictions or civil findings for specified statutes, passed amid heated debate and testimony that the bill may affect a pending Supreme Court case. Supporters cited child‑welfare risks; opponents argued it targets a specific case and raises due‑process concerns.
Get email alerts on the Family Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate approved Senate Bill 227, which restricts adoption in cases where a prospective parent has been convicted of or found by a court (by a preponderance of the evidence) to have violated specified statutes. Floor discussion was lengthy and emotionally charged.
Opponents, including an attorney who identified himself as representing a family in a pending Supreme Court appeal, argued the bill appeared tailored to affect a single pending case and would be inappropriate as special‑purpose legislation. The attorney said the family had a favorable home study and no criminal convictions but had acknowledged a plural marriage, and warned the Legislature should not use statute to decide individual appeals that are properly before courts.
Proponents, including social‑work witnesses and other senators, urged priority for child welfare and said the state must avoid placing children into environments the sponsors described as potentially harmful. Supporters also emphasized the state’s historical commitment to prohibiting polygamy and said the bill reflects that policy.
The measure drew questions about evidentiary standards: the bill permits a court to apply a civil preponderance standard to determine violations, which several senators observed differs from the criminal 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard and could raise constitutional or due‑process concerns. Some senators recommended additional study or raising the evidentiary bar, but under suspension of the rules the Senate voted to pass SB227. The final roll call on the floor recorded 23 ayes, 4 nays and 2 absent.
