Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Childcare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes bill to create Office of Child Care amid dispute over placement and cost
Summary
After floor debate about whether childcare coordination should sit in economic development or social services, the Senate passed House Bill 304 to establish an Office of Child Care; final vote recorded 18 ayes, 9 nays, 2 absent.
The Utah Senate voted to pass House Bill 304, which would establish an Office of Child Care to coordinate childcare programs that were described on the floor as currently spread across multiple agencies.
Senator Carling (floor sponsor) described the bill as proposed by the governor's commission and 'supported very strongly by the governor Bangerter,' saying the office would provide '1 source that people could come to' and would help businesses develop on-site or near-site childcare options. Opponents including Senator Tempest argued the function did not belong in the Department of Economic Development and suggested childcare programs should be grouped under social services. Senator Bartlett countered with statistics and business-facing arguments, saying '2 thirds of the women in the labor force with pre preschool children are either the family's sole wage earner or are supplementing a family income of $15,000 or less' and pressed for the business / labor-market rationale for the office.
Fiscal concerns were discussed: one senator called the initial set-up cost of roughly $150,000 into question and noted ongoing fiscal pressures. After debate the question was called and the clerk announced 'House bill 304 shows 18 ayes, 9 nays, 2 being absent; bill passes.' The measure will be signed by the president in open session and returned to the House for their further action.
What it does: the floor summary characterizes the Office of Child Care as non-entitlement technical assistance for business to develop quality childcare programs, create provider information networks, and coordinate existing programs rather than supplant social-services benefits.
Next steps: House concurrence/house action, and administrative placement (department/agency) and appropriation details will determine final structure and funding lines.
