Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics Reform topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate considers joint-rules ethics changes including $250 lobbyist gift limit; item circled for further review

Utah State Senate · February 19, 1990
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senator Barlow introduced Joint Resolution 34 proposing three ethics-rule changes: require recorded conflict declarations, cap lobbyist expenditures to $250 per legislator per year, and require disclosure when a legislator (or household member) receives financial compensation tied to legislative outcomes; senators raised concerns about travel and education trips and asked to hold the item for further consideration.

On the floor Senator Barlow introduced Joint Resolution 34, a joint-rules proposal to amend legislative ethics procedures. He described three principal proposals: (1) a ban or rule that a lobbyist who spends more than $250 on a legislator in a year would violate the code; (2) require that conflict-of-interest declarations be recorded in the committee minutes and journals in addition to any oral on-the-floor declarations; and (3) require that a legislator declare when a customer or client has paid or offered to pay the legislator or the legislator's household or business and to note that in the journal.

Floor discussion centered on whether the $250 threshold would unintentionally bar beneficial informational or educational trips, with several senators asking how the rule would treat invited travel (examples discussed included study trips to Calgary and conferences). Senator Barlow said the rule only applies when there is an identifiable pending bill or lobbying intent tied to the payment. Senators asked for clarifying language to cover salary continuations (for example, if an employer continues to pay a legislator's salary while serving) and other edge cases.

Because only 14 senators were present at one point and additional questions remained, the body decided to circle the resolution for later consideration rather than proceed to a vote.