Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate narrowly reconsiders and advances $35,000 study of Promontory rail restoration

Utah Senate · February 22, 1991
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers debated a $35,000 appropriation to study restoring a rail line to Promontory Monument; the bill initially failed for lack of quorum support but, after reconsideration, the Senate approved the study and sent the bill to the House.

The Utah Senate on Feb. 22 approved a $35,000 appropriation to study the economic feasibility and projected costs of restoring a rail line to Promontory Monument, a proposal its sponsor said could serve local industry and draw tourists.

Senator Wen L. Richards, sponsor of Senate Bill 170, told colleagues the study would examine a rail extension from Corinne to Promontory, including an eight-mile stretch to the monument and possible participation by the National Park Service, the railroad museum in Ogden and the Department of Defense. Richards said the project could bring “millions of tourists into Utah” and provide rail access for local businesses such as Thiokol.

The measure initially failed on a roll call when only 13 senators voted aye and the bill lacked the 15 votes needed for passage on first consideration. Richards asked to change his vote and the body granted reconsideration. On reconsideration, with more senators present, the roll call produced 20 ayes, 6 nays and 3 absences, and the bill was advanced to the House for consideration.

The bill’s fiscal note is $35,000 from the General Fund, described on the floor as a typical cost for comparable studies. Supporters emphasized the project crosses county lines and would require collaboration among public agencies and private entities; opponents questioned whether the study funds were appropriate when other demands competed for state money.

The Senate placed SB170 on the calendar to be sent to the House; no final construction decision was made — the vote funds only a feasibility and economic impact study.

Provenance: The measure and the recorded votes were discussed and tallied on the Senate floor during the Feb. 22 session.