Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flag Desecration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate endorses resolution urging constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration
Summary
Senators adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution 3, urging Congress to pursue a constitutional amendment forbidding physical desecration of the U.S. flag; supporters framed the measure as symbolic, while opponents argued the constitution is not the proper place for the change. Vote: 22–1, 5 absent.
Get email alerts on the Flag Desecration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate on the floor Wednesday adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution 3, a nonbinding measure urging the state’s congressional delegation to support a constitutional amendment that would prohibit physical desecration of the U.S. flag.
Sponsor Senator Nielsen opened with a personal account about the flag’s meaning and service in wartime, saying the flag "represents a total difference of life" and that a constitutional remedy would restore national consensus on the symbol. He told colleagues the resolution was intended as an expression of the legislature’s view and urged its passage.
Senator Swan and several other senators disagreed that the Constitution should be amended for this purpose. Swan said he had promised students he would not support a constitutional amendment and argued that the resolution’s level of detail was inappropriate for a constitutional change. "I don't think this is what the constitution should be," Swan said during debate.
Supporters framed the resolution as an expression of respect for a national emblem and a call for federal action; critics warned the measure could overreach and that statutory or other remedies might address the concern without altering the Constitution.
After floor debate, Senate leaders moved the resolution for immediate consideration under suspension of the rules. The Senate recorded 22 ayes, 1 nay and 5 absent; the resolution now goes to the House.
The Senate’s action is symbolic: a concurrent resolution does not by itself change law but signals the Legislature’s position to federal officials and the governor.
