Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cable Customer Service topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate gives tentative approval to cable consumer‑service bill after testimony on widespread complaints

Utah State Senate · February 13, 1990
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate advanced a measure giving the Public Service Commission authority to set and enforce customer‑service standards for cable companies in places where local enforcement is weak, following testimony that the PSC receives about 10–15 service complaints weekly; vote recorded and later corrected to 17–10 in favor.

The Utah Senate moved forward with legislation to authorize the Public Service Commission to make rules and enforce consumer‑service standards for cable television providers in areas where local governments lack capacity to resolve subscriber complaints.

Senator Finlayson, sponsor of Senate Bill 201, said the bill does not regulate content or set rates (authority on rates remains with federal law) but would give the PSC authority to address service‑quality problems: lengthy outages, unburied or unreturned yard trenches, delayed hookups, and failures to provide promised restoration work. Commissioner Stewart of the Public Service Commission testified to repeated complaints and urged state backstop authority for customers who have no effective local remedy.

“Our people tell me that our complaints have been fairly consistent for the last two or three years,” Commissioner Stewart said; “we get between 10 and 15 a week, and all this would do would give us the authority to say to those companies, if these people have a complaint, you have to take care of them, and we have the authority to enforce it if you don't.”

Supporters argued that some small cities and counties lack resources to enforce franchise obligations. Opponents warned that the bill could erode local authority and create regulatory duplication; several senators said they preferred local enforcement where capacity exists. The bill includes language allowing localities to adopt ordinances regulating consumer‑service practices provided they meet minimal public‑health and safety standards and do not conflict with federal preemption.

The Senate called the question and recorded an initial roll call that showed 16 ayes, 10 nays and 3 absent; clerks later entered a correction to the record changing the tally to 17 ayes, 10 nays and 2 absent.

What’s next: With the corrected tally entered, the bill was placed on the third‑reading calendar; the PSC and local governments will be key actors in drafting rules and responding to enforcement requests if the bill becomes law.