Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Real Estate Disclosure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate debates bill to limit disclosure of "stigmatized" houses, citing AIDS and other harms

Utah State Senate (1990 Utah Legislature) · February 1, 1990
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 18 would make many "psychologically impacted" or "stigmatized" conditions (including AIDS status) non‑material facts for real estate disclosure; supporters say it resolves conflicts with federal fair‑housing rules, while opponents warn buyers may be kept unaware of murders, suicides or other serious histories.

Senate Bill 18, introduced by Senator Lane Beatty and carried to the floor by the business and labor committee, prompted an extended, sometimes contentious debate over whether sellers or agents must disclose so‑called "psychologically impacted" or "stigmatized" conditions attached to residential property.

Beatty told the Senate the bill reflects a trend in disclosure law and aims to resolve conflicts with federal fair‑housing protections. He summarized the bill's effect: "This bill states that all psychologically impacts or stigmas which are associated with real property are not material facts and need not be disclosed to a potential purchaser or lessee." He and witnesses highlighted litigation elsewhere — notably the Reed v. King California decision — as the backdrop for the measure.

Opponents warned the definition in the bill would sweep in violent or criminal histories that many buyers consider material. Senator Swan and others urged narrowing the definition so that murder, felony or suicide would still be disclosable if known to the seller or agent. "I feel better about the AIDS victim, but I am not so sure that I feel comfortable about the felony having been committed in the home," Swan said during floor debate.

Supporters argued that federal law (the amended Federal Fair Housing Act) restricts agents from asking or disclosing certain personal health information, and that exposing agents to civil liability for questions they are legally barred from asking would be inconsistent. Beatty said the bill "removes liability from an agent...to determine if this home ever did have a murder, if somebody had AIDS" and that fraud or intentional misrepresentation remains actionable under existing law.

Senators proposed, debated and defeated motions to delete lines that would remove murder, felony and suicide from the bill's definition of stigma. The body ultimately placed SB18 on the third‑reading calendar after recorded action on second reading.