Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Dam Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances dam-safety bill after debate on exemptions and prioritization
Summary
Lawmakers amended and advanced a comprehensive dam-safety bill that implements audit recommendations after a prior failure; floor debate centered on the 20-acre-foot exemption threshold, state engineer oversight, and prioritizing higher-risk dams. The bill was placed on third-reading after unanimous recorded support in the final roll call.
The Utah Senate advanced a dam-safety overhaul after extended floor debate and a committee-of-the-whole review that added an amendment package focused on prioritization and expedited treatment for high-risk dams.
Senator Patty (floor sponsor) said the bill incorporated recommendations from a legislative audit conducted after the Coral Creek disaster and that the measure updates the state’s dam-safety law. Floor amendments require the state engineer to prepare a prioritized list of dams by risk (loss of life, property damage, and dam size) and direct an annual program to select a fixed number of dams for attention. Sponsors also removed a provision that would have allowed owners up to five years to correct deficiencies where the amendments considered that too long for highly unsafe dams.
Bob Morgan, identified in the record as the state engineer and head of water rights, answered senators’ questions about the acreage threshold that would allow the attorney general to exempt certain small impoundments from the chapter. Morgan explained the 20 acre-feet figure is a commonly used Western standard intended to exclude small farm or 'frog pond' impoundments while retaining authority to review any structure that poses a threat to life or property, and noted the office can waive plan-review requirements if a demonstration shows no threat exists. "If it can be demonstrated to us by the owner that it would not threaten life or property, we have the opportunity to waive that," Morgan said.
Senators asked whether changing the exemption to 50 acre-feet would create administrative burdens or inconsistency with other Western states; the state engineer said 20 acre-feet is an accepted standard across many Western jurisdictions and more convenient for statewide practice. Concerns were raised about potential liability for the state if the engineer’s office performed detailed design reviews; the state engineer said independent review teams and retained responsibility of the project engineer mitigate that risk.
After debate and amendment activity, a roll-call recorded 28 ayes with no nays and Senate Bill 56 was placed on the third-reading calendar. Sponsors said the fiscal impact would be small (floor estimates and auditor comments put additional cost under $10,000), and the bill’s prioritization approach is intended to focus scarce inspection and remediation resources on the highest-risk structures first.
Floor discussion emphasized public-safety considerations (debris basins near urban areas and bigger reservoirs), the state engineer’s discretionary waiver authority, and the need for clear rulemaking to implement the new enforcement and priority-list provisions.
