Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics Disclosure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate approves joint rules change on disclosures after amendment and roll-call

Utah State Senate · February 26, 1991
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate voted to adopt SJR 17 (joint rules on disclosure and conflicts) under suspension of the rules, recording a final roll-call result of 23 ayes and no nays; floor amendments addressed circulation and management-committee determination of form contents.

Senator Barlow introduced SJR 17, a joint-rules measure intended to clarify legislators' conflict-of-interest disclosures and require both written filing and optional oral declaration before votes. The measure generated debate over whether the disclosures should be circulated to the entire body at the opening session.

Senator Howell offered a friendly amendment to add seven words to require that the written disclosure "will be circulated to the body." Opponents including Senator Hilliard objected on the grounds of administrative burden and public-record access; proponents said circulating the disclosures would help newer members and improve transparency. The floor called for and completed a division tally on the amendment and the motion result is recorded in the transcript as passing (division and voice votes recorded).

Later the Senate considered and approved motions to delete specific lines and to renumber parts of the joint rules language, and then moved SJR 17 for final passage under suspension of the rules. The Senate recorded the final roll call on SJR 17 as 23 ayes, no nays, 6 absent; the bill was announced as carried and will be transmitted through the usual channels. Senators also requested that management-committee technical determinations about the form content be left to the management committee, and clarifying journal language was referenced in floor discussion.

The action changes internal joint rules about required disclosure and the manner of their handling going forward; senators on both sides framed the debate as balancing transparency with practical paperwork burdens on members.