Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances House Bill 397 after heated debate over property-tax shift
Summary
After extended debate, the Utah Senate advanced House Bill 397 (property tax amendments) on second reading 20–9. Supporters said the measure settles legal exposure from the AMEX decision; opponents said it shifts roughly $11.5 million onto locally assessed businesses and urged delay or offsets.
Representative John Valentine urged the Senate to adopt the third substitute of House Bill 397 to correct disparities exposed by the AMEX court decision and avoid larger retroactive liabilities. "This allows us to recapture the majority of that money from the same entities that will be deriving the benefit," Valentine said during his opening remarks.
Senator John Peterson and other proponents described the bill as a technical and fiscal package: a transition-year homeowner exemption of 29.75 percent (reduced to 29.5 percent in 1992), a permissive intangible discount of up to 5 percent during a study period, and a uniform in-lieu fee of 1.77 percent effective Jan. 1, 1992. Sponsor remarks included revenue estimates and examples intended to show the bill mitigates the state's exposure while aiming to keep the shift broadly neutral.
Opponents, led by Senator Lyle W. Hilliard and Senator Mantis, argued the package shifts significant property-tax burdens to locally assessed small businesses. "By this vote you are increasing taxes," Senator Hilliard said, pressing that the legislation would raise roughly $11.5 million on locally assessed enterprises and urging the body to delay until mitigation measures could be developed. Senator Mantis described the bill as an unfair transfer to smaller businesses and said he would oppose it for that reason.
Senators also debated targeted language to protect intellectual-property items. The sponsor moved to reinsert the words "copyrights or patents" on page 6 and asked that clarifying intent language be placed in the Senate Journal to state the changes "are made to remove definitional valuation difficulties and are not intended to alter the treatment of the items deleted for assessment and taxation purposes." That journal statement was ordered spread to clarify legislative intent should challenges arise.
After amendments and a lengthy floor debate, the Senate recorded a second-reading vote of 20 ayes and 9 nays and placed HB 397 on the third-reading calendar for final consideration. The Senate summary of projected impacts and the journal intent statement will accompany further action.
Next steps: HB 397 was placed on the third-reading calendar; sponsors and opponents said they expect further consideration and possible technical refinements before final passage.
