Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Adopts Revised Confirmation Rules to Make Judicial Hearings Conditional
Summary
With amendments, the Utah Senate approved SR 3 to clarify its confirmation process for judicial nominees, adding language to make confirmation hearings conditional on a chairman’s call and requiring limited notification to the judicial nominating commission about complaints.
Senator Hilliard proposed two amendments to SR 3, the rule on confirmation proceedings for gubernatorial judicial nominations, intended to make confirmation hearings conditional rather than automatic. The first amendment adds the phrase "if called by the chairman" to the gubernatorial nomination period language so hearings will not occur automatically; the second amendment makes certain reporting conditional "if a meeting is held."
Hilliard explained the changes were intended to balance confidentiality of the judicial nominating commission with the Senate’s need to know whether particular allegations or complaints had been considered. He described a new process in which the confirmation committee chairman would write the nominating commission to ask whether a named complaint was known to the commission and the commission would simply respond whether it was aware of such a complaint, without divulging details of deliberations.
The adopted rule also affirms that nominees are presumed qualified but will have the burden of demonstrating qualifications if hearings are held. Proponents said the changes would make the confirmation process more orderly and allow senators access to relevant background without breaking commission confidentiality.
The Senate adopted the rule with the amendments and placed SR 3 on the third‑reading calendar; the journal records 27 ayes and two absences.
