Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Abortion Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate passes abortion‑limitation substitute bill after floor debate; 19‑10
Summary
The Utah State Senate on Day 12 passed substitute Senate Bill 23, an abortion‑limitation bill, after floor debate about reporting requirements, medical discretion and potential constitutional vulnerability. The final roll call was 19 ayes to 10 nays.
The Utah State Senate passed substitute Senate Bill 23, an abortion‑limitation measure, by a final roll call of 19 ayes to 10 nays after extended floor explanations and debate.
Senator Lee Leroy McAllister moved that the Senate concur with the House amendments to substitute SB 23; the motion was approved and the chamber proceeded to explanations and a final roll call. Lawmakers on the floor raised a mix of policy and constitutional concerns, including whether the bill’s reporting requirements would make sensitive cases public, how clinicians would be protected when making medical decisions, and whether the measure would survive court challenge.
Opponents warned of practical consequences and constitutional uncertainty. One senator cautioned that the bill, as amended, left unclear terms that could expose treating physicians to criminal liability and said the addition of a 20‑week gestational‑age exception raised further problems. Another senator urged caution, saying the measure could create public records in cases involving sexual assault or incest and risk secondary harm to victims.
Supporters argued the bill sends a public policy message discouraging use of abortion for birth control and said they expected it would reduce abortions in the state. Following floor explanations of vote, the clerk announced a final tally of 19 ayes and 10 nays and that the bill would be returned to the House for further action. The chief clerk later reported the House had signed the enrolled bill and it was being prepared for the president’s signature and referral to the governor for consideration.
Senator Steele, speaking during explanations of vote on the floor, said the bill’s vague standards risked exposing doctors to criminal liability and voted no on the measure. (Direct quotations in the record are attributable only to speakers identified in the official transcript.)
Next steps: the enrolled SB 23 was scheduled for the president’s signature and transmission to the governor for his further action.
