Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senators debate two competing congressional maps as critics call one plan gerrymandered

Utah State Senate · October 29, 1991
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate debated the committee's congressional plan (SB2) and an alternate plan offered as SB3. Sponsors said each plan aimed to create an urban‑rural mix for three districts; critics called the committee plan partisan and accused it of gerrymandering, particularly slicing Salt Lake City constituencies. The chamber circulated plans and deferred final votes until more members were present.

The Utah Senate spent the afternoon debating competing congressional redistricting proposals, with members sharply divided over how to balance counties, communities of interest and political composition.

Senator Reese presented the committee's plan (Senate Bill 2), arguing the map created three districts each containing both urban and rural areas to promote balanced representation and to help Utah's three congressmen act "in concert" on statewide issues. Reese said the committee reviewed many options and that the plan's population…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans