Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate hears appraisal testimony on Book Cliffs conservation initiative as trust-land concerns surface
Summary
At a Feb. 11 Senate hearing on SB 114, appraisers and State Land Board representatives debated the valuation methods for ranches in the Book Cliffs initiative, focusing on grazing-permit values, mineral-rights protections and local tax impacts; the bill was circled for amendment review and the Land Board will meet Friday.
Members of the Utah Senate spent a prolonged portion of their Feb. 11 session on Senate Bill 114, the Book Cliffs Conservation Initiative appropriations measure, focusing on competing land valuations and how the proposal would affect state trust revenues.
Senator Fordham moved the body into a committee of the whole so certified appraisers could explain their work. Testifying, the panel identified Blaine D. Hales (senior) and Blaine Dugan Hales (junior) as the appraisers for the subject ranch; the younger Hales told senators, “I appraised the property in, 1990 … for $2,157,000,” and described using seven comparable ranch sales and a market-approach analysis that produced roughly $1,023 per animal unit for the subject property.
Appraisers and senators disputed simple per-acre comparisons offered by some local figures. One appraiser explained that a ranch’s sale price reflects multiple components—fee land, buildings and, importantly, grazing permits—and warned that dividing total price by acres misstates value. He provided per-acre breakdowns for irrigated cropland, meadows and summer and winter ranges and said grazing rights account for 60–80% of feed value in many of these operations.
Doug Bates, representing the State Land Board, told the Senate the board will review the initiative Friday and stressed fiduciary constraints: “the state must receive the full value of any lands transferred from it,” Bates said, noting roughly 114,000 acres in the initiative area are trust land and that mineral and lease revenues are a core trust obligation.
Senators raised practical concerns: variability in animal-unit values (witnesses cited figures from about $30 per month in some local estimates up to $1,100–$1,200 per animal unit in comparable sales), erosion and wildlife impacts that can depress grazing values, and how in-lieu-of-tax payments would affect counties. Panel witnesses said grazing permits traded at a wide range and that some comparables included different mixes of land, water and reserved minerals, complicating direct comparisons.
Procedurally, senators voted to "circle" the bill to ensure an amendment protecting state trust mineral priorities could be fitted into the text properly; the motion carried and the measure was moved on to the third-reading calendar for later action. Bates said the Land Board has not yet taken a formal position but will do so at its upcoming meeting.
Next steps: the bill was circled for amendment work and senators requested additional numeric context (assessor valuations and specific comparables) be provided to the chamber before further final action.
