Senate considers substitute for hazardous and solid‑waste bill, debates fund prioritization and fees

Senate Bill 25, a substitute measure addressing hazardous and solid waste, drew floor debate Feb. 4 after a committee recommendation to replace the original bill in body and title. Committee chair Senator Steven J. Reese presented technical amendments and a substantive change to the Environmental Management Fund language, proposing that funds "shall be appropriated as prioritized by the legislature for specific environmental mitigation and cleanup projects."

Proponents said the amendment would make the fund’s use subject to legislative priority rather than department discretion. Opponents, including Senator Steele and others, argued that narrowly earmarking account receipts could constrain agencies’ ability to respond and reintroduce funds into the general appropriation process. Senators also discussed fee levels for disposal — one exchange referenced initial fees of $2 per ton rising to $2.50 — and whether those levels were adequate or overly generous.

Floor votes on some proposed changes failed (a counted vote on one amendment resulted in an even split and the amendment failed). Senator Reese and staff indicated additional amendments would be prepared; later in the session the sponsor moved to remove the circle on SB25 and place it among unfinished business to continue work. The motion to remove the circle and put SB25 back as unfinished business passed.

What happens next: The bill remains unfinished business so senators and staff can refine language on fund priorities, fee schedules and related technical corrections. Supporters signaled they will bring further amendments and consult fiscal staff before returning it to the floor.