Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Parental Involvement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate pauses bill requiring employer support for parent-teacher meetings after heated debate
Summary
Senators debated Substitute Senate Bill 37, which would require certain employers to allow employees time off for school-related needs. Supporters urged it would help parents in crisis; opponents warned of unnecessary mandates and business burdens. Sponsor moved to "circle" the bill for further work.
A substitute bill that would require some employers to permit employees to attend parent-teacher conferences and respond to school emergencies was debated for more than an hour before the sponsor moved to "circle" the measure for further negotiation.
Senator Shepherd, sponsor of Substitute Senate Bill 37, said the bill began after repeated calls from PTA members and teachers and that the substitute reflects compromise with business groups, including removing penalties and narrowing coverage. "What I want is for this to work out for both business and for parents so that we can send a signal to parents that it's alright for them to go to school when they need to go to school," Shepherd said on the floor.
Opposition was led by Senator Chuck Peterson, who said he could not find employers in his community asking for the change and read a list of statewide business groups opposing the bill — including the Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce, Utah Manufacturers Association, Utah Retail Merchants Association and others. "I just can't see any need for the bill, and I'm very opposed to cluttering up our laws," Peterson said.
Other senators split on whether the problem is pervasive. Senator Beatty and principal Patrick Garcia described schools where parents had been prevented from leaving work — Garcia told the Senate that in his elementary school it had happened "four or five times" in a year — and said a written policy could reduce the chilling effect that prevents some low‑wage workers from asking for time off. Senator McMullen and others argued many employers already accommodate such requests and warned the measure imposed a state mandate.
Sponsor changes in the substitute bill were detailed on the floor: the provision was narrowed from "25 employees" to "25 full‑time employees," civil penalties were removed, and some earlier provisions (parent‑teacher/education‑plan mandates) were taken out after business requests.
After extended debate over amendments and enforcement, Senator Shepherd offered a motion to "circle" the bill so the sponsor and business representatives could continue negotiating changes. The motion carried by voice vote; SSB 37 will be held for further amendment rather than advancing to third reading at this session.
Next steps: the sponsor said she would work with interested senators and business representatives on targeted amendments before the bill returns to the floor.
