Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves constitutional amendment to shift start of annual session after debate on revenue timing and lobbying
Summary
After hours of floor debate and a failed compromise amendment, the Utah Senate approved SJR 4 to move the Legislature’s start date later in the year, with supporters saying the change will improve revenue projections and opponents warning of longer sessions and higher costs. The measure passed 18–11 and will go to the House.
After extended floor debate, the Utah Senate on Jan. 21 passed SJR 4, a constitutional amendment to change the start date of the annual legislative session from the second Monday to a later date. Senator Lyle Hilliard, sponsor of the resolution, framed the proposal as a way to give staff and fiscal analysts more time to produce accurate revenue estimates, saying the extra weeks would make the Legislature “more accurate in our revenue projections and more accurate in the decisions we need to make as we affect budgets and affects lives.”
Opponents argued the delay would impose costs on state agencies and create hardships for private citizens who serve the Legislature. Senator Penlandson told colleagues, “I’m still not convinced that, by the 2 week delay, we’ll do our job any better,” and warned the change would prolong sessions and burden people who must take time away from their jobs.
Senator Leray McAllister moved an amendment to compromise by moving the start only one week (to the third Monday), but that amendment failed on a roll-call vote, 12–17. Supporters pressed on, including members of the legislative process committee who said the two‑week change had been its chief recommendation and reflected input gathered from a survey of legislators. Senator Mantis urged colleagues to “vote on what’s really right for the state of Utah.”
On the final roll call the Senate recorded 18 ayes and 11 noes; the chair announced the motion carried and that SJR 4 will be sent to the House for further consideration. The amendment must follow constitutional amendment procedures in both chambers before it would take effect.
