Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bear River Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves Bear River Task Force reauthorization and $425,000 appropriation; one lawmaker objects
Summary
The Senate reauthorized the Bear River Development Task Force (SB 18) and approved a $425,000 appropriation (SB 19) to support a recommended project; SB 19 passed 25–1 with three absences after a senator argued the funds diverted project money to a single community.
Get email alerts on the Bear River Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate moved to reauthorize the Bear River Development Task Force (Senate Bill 18) and approved Senate Bill 19, a $425,000 appropriation intended to finance a work project recommended by the task force. Sponsors described SB 19 as funding work already recommended by the task force and drawn from funds appropriated previously. The bills passed on the floor and were ordered sent to the House for further action.
Senator Kerry Peterson and Senator Finlayson, among others, urged members to prioritize task‑force requests and to submit additional requests to research staff for consideration. Finlayson described SB 19 as a $425,000 appropriation to implement a task‑force recommended work project, drawing from previously appropriated money.
One senator explained a 'no' vote, saying the appropriation deviated from the Bear River project's original plan by reallocating $80,000 to a single community to study a secondary‑water feasibility plan rather than using the funds across Bear River projects. "I think that such a study should be the responsibility of the community that is going to benefit from it," the senator said, and described the allocation as a misappropriation of funds designated for Bear River development. The senator voted no; the roll call recorded SB 19 as passing with 25 ayes, one nay and three absences.
Senate Bill 18, the task‑force reauthorization, was presented and described as maintaining the expertise of the group and allowing it to meet next year to review study results relevant to Hiram Dam area development. The sponsor asked that the bill be read for the third time and not for final passage at that point, to preserve opportunity for further consideration.
Both bills will be transmitted to the House for further action. The transcript does not record final implementation dates or detailed funding breakdowns for projects beyond the $425,000 figure noted on the Senate floor.
