Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate approves capital outlay 'equalization' bill after heated debate over tax impact

Utah State Senate · February 26, 1993
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 199, a capital outlay equalization measure that supporters say moves toward equity in school capital funding, passed after debate about a likely 2-mill property tax increase in many districts and distribution fairness. The roll call recorded 16 ayes, 13 nays.

Senate Bill 199, presented by Senator Beatty as an equalization measure for education capital outlay and debt service, drew sustained debate on the floor. Senator Lyle Hilliard summarized the bill’s mechanics, explaining that the bill would establish an assessing-and-collecting levy with 60% of a specified rate established as a state levy distributed to counties on a per-parcel basis and the remaining 40% left to counties to impose to meet local goals. Hilliard and others said the change would not increase the overall levy statewide but would reallocate responsibility and, in some counties, result in reduced tax burdens while others could see increases.

Opponents raised concerns that the measure effectively enacts a 2-mill property tax increase in certain districts, and questioned the fairness of the distribution formula and legislative control over how the funds are spent. Senators Steele and Reid urged caution and recommended more time to fine-tune the distribution method; Senator Steele emphasized local responsibility and urged members to examine local impacts. Supporters said the measure moves capital funding toward greater equity and urged passage.

The Senate called the question and recorded a roll call: the bill passed with 16 ayes and 13 nays. Sponsors signaled additional work on the allocation mechanics in future committee or conference discussions.