Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legislative Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances package of bills to House; several noncontroversial measures pass

Utah Senate · January 29, 1993
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During the Jan. 28 Utah Senate floor session senators passed a series of bills (SB25, SB26, SB56, SB57, SB62, SB65, SB77 among others) and transmitted them to the House. Most measures were procedural or statutory cleanups and received recorded voice or roll‑call results on the floor.

The Utah Senate advanced a batch of bills to the House with mostly routine debate and recorded votes.

What passed: The clerk recorded passage or placement on the calendar for multiple bills. Notable floor actions included Substitute Senate Bill 25 (dual enrollment amendments, passed with a recorded tally shown in the journal as 23 ayes, 1 nay, 5 absent) and Senate Bill 26 (reauthorization of the education choice task force, recorded as 25 ayes, no nays). The Senate also passed statutory clean‑up and housekeeping bills including SB56 (boxing rule updates), SB57 (bidding of stationary supplies), SB62 (county recorder books and supplies) and SB77 (technical corrections to committee membership language); several of these were sent to the House for further action with recorded tallies noted on the floor.

Context: Most of the items were described on the floor as technical fixes, housekeeping, or to continue existing advisory/task‑force work. Senators called the question, handled roll calls, and — where requested — placed bills on third‑reading calendars before transmission to the House.

Procedural notes: Standing committee reports were read and multiple bills were placed on second‑reading calendars. The Senate recessed briefly for rules committee business and returned to the floor before adjourning.

What to watch: Any contentious or detailed fiscal questions were left for committee record or for future floor debate (for example, SB75 required additional technical follow‑up).