Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate tightens rules on tabled bills, adopts SR 1 after close votes
Summary
The Utah Senate debated proposed rule changes on handling ‘tabled’ bills versus 'held' bills and approved SR 1 (rules revisions) after close floor votes and a roll-call announcement of 28 ayes and one absence.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah State Senate adopted a rules resolution revising procedures for handling tabled bills and fiscal notes after extended floor debate.
Senator John Holmgren, sponsor of SJR 3, presented changes including requirements for new fiscal notes following substantial amendments and a proposal to move the bill-introduction deadline from day 30 to day 22 for the session. Much of the floor discussion centered on the difference between tabling a bill (which would send it back to rules if not lifted at the next committee meeting) and holding a bill (which the committee chair could place back on its agenda).
Several senators worried that the proposed automatic return-to-rules provision could leave sponsors without adequate time to gather information; one senator argued that sending a bill back to rules after only one meeting was "acting too quickly" and proposed restoring language allowing more time. Supporters said the change would clarify where a bill stands and avoid bills languishing in limbo.
After debate, the Senate called the question on an amendment and proceeded to consider SR 1 and related rule changes. The presiding officer announced the passage of SR 1 with the recorded result, "28 ayes, no nays, 1 being absent." The resolution was placed on the third-reading calendar and sent to the House without further action where indicated.
The transcript records close standing counts during an earlier amendment vote and floor discussion tied to whether committees should 'table' or 'hold' bills. Senators requested clarifying language and staff analysis to ensure committee sponsors would have reasonable opportunity to pursue further information before bills were sent back to rules.
