Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Juvenile Gun Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah Senate passes package of juvenile-justice and gun measures, sending them to the House

Utah State Senate · October 12, 1993
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate advanced multiple juvenile-justice and gun-related bills Oct. 12, 1993 — including SB2 (possession by a minor), substitute SB5 (sale of firearms to juveniles) and SB17 (vehicle forfeiture for drive-by shootings) — approving them under suspension and transmitting them to the House for further action.

The Utah State Senate on Oct. 12 moved quickly through a package of juvenile-justice and firearms measures, approving several bills under suspension of the rules and sending them back to the House for further action.

Senators approved Substitute Senate Bill 5, described by sponsor Senator Holmgren as a ‘‘simplified version’’ intended to clarify seller responsibility for firearms and to focus enforcement on the person who sells a weapon or the adult who turns a firearm over to a minor. Legal counsel told the chamber that under Title 76 (the state Uniform Criminal Code) use of an illegal means — for example, a false ID — by a buyer does not automatically excuse the seller, meaning sellers remain potentially liable in some cases.

Senate Bill 2, titled in the chamber as the penalty for possession of a firearm by a minor and carried by Senator Robert Steiner, was read for the third time after amendments that, among other things, added language on page 5 to recognize prohibitions ‘‘by state or local law’’ in certain localities. Senator Steiner urged the Senate to act, saying, “I think this bill will save some lives,” and the chamber recorded final passage with no dissenting votes on the final roll call.

The Senate also approved Senate Bill 17, which creates a forfeiture mechanism for motor vehicles used in drive-by shootings. Debate on SB17 centered on protections for innocent owners and how seized proceeds should be used; senators accepted House amendments that clarified owner protections and added a proposal to prioritize restitution to victims through the crime victims reparation fund before transferring any remainder to the general fund.

Other measures the Senate passed or concurred in that address juvenile court procedure, notification, and related appropriations included House Bill 1 (parental attendance in juvenile proceedings), House Bill 3 (youth corrections/work camp provisions), House Bill 12 (distribution of juvenile photographs and fingerprints under specified conditions) and supplementary appropriations in House Bill 13 for juvenile reform programs.

Votes at a glance - Substitute Senate Bill 5 (sale of firearms to juveniles): Substitute passed; roll call recorded 27 ayes, 0 nays (substitute reported). Sent to the House. - Senate Bill 2 (possession by a minor): Final passage recorded 28 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent. Sent to the House. - Senate Bill 17 (motor vehicle forfeiture for drive-by shootings): Final passage recorded 25 ayes, 1 nay, 3 absent. Sent to the House. - House Bill 1 (parents/guardians at juvenile proceedings): Final passage recorded 22 ayes, 2 nays, 5 absent. Sent to the House. - House Bill 3 (youth corrections/work-camp substitute): Final passage recorded 24 ayes, 1 nay, 4 absent. Sent to the House. - House Bill 12 (photographs and fingerprints distribution): Final passage recorded 25 ayes, 1 nay, 3 absent. Sent to the House. - House Bill 13 (supplemental appropriations for juvenile reform): Final passage recorded 25 ayes, 0 nays, 4 absent. Sent to the House.

Why it matters: The measures together aim to tighten penalties and enforcement tools related to juvenile firearm possession and drive-by shootings while also funding expanded juvenile corrections capacity and programs. Sponsors framed the package as both punitive (to remove guns from minors and sanction dealers) and practical (to provide capacity and programs for youth at risk). Several senators stressed that local concerns — especially in cities where discharge of a firearm is already prohibited — required carefully drafted language to avoid conflicts between state and local rules.

What’s next: The bills were transmitted to the House for whatever further action is required (enrolling, engrossing, return signatures and delivery to the governor). Several of the measures included technical or House amendments that will be incorporated in enrolled copies before gubernatorial review.