Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate passes statewide smoking restrictions after hours of amendments and debate

Utah State Senate · February 28, 1994
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate on Feb. 28, 1994, approved House Bill 50, a package of statewide smoking restrictions, after extended floor debate and multiple failed amendments; the final roll-call vote was 22 ayes, 6 nays and 1 absent. Lawmakers split on exemptions for airports and truck stops and on the bill’s effective date.

The Utah State Senate passed House Bill 50 on Feb. 28, 1994, approving a wide-ranging set of restrictions on smoking in public places and workplaces. The measure cleared the chamber on a recorded vote of 22 ayes, 6 nays and 1 absent and was sent to the House for its further action.

Supporters framed the bill as a public-health step to protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke. Opponents pressed a string of amendments seeking targeted exemptions and accommodations — including provisions for separately ventilated smoking rooms, exemptions for truck stops and a delayed effective date — but most of those proposals failed on the floor. The Senate adopted one change narrowing airport smoking-room language and rejected an amendment to postpone the law’s effective date until July 1, 1996.

Floor debate centered on workplace safety for employees, equity between businesses and travelers, and potential economic effects. Senator Wharton, who spoke in support of one amendment, said on the record, “I rise to support this amendment.” Senator Demetrij urged colleagues to consider an amendment exempting truck stops as a compromise during debate: “I just . . . like to urge this body to consider this.” Senator Stewart announced a possible conflict of interest and voted in favor of the bill, saying, “I declare a possible conflict of interest on this bill, and I vote aye for it.” These quotations are taken from the on-the-record floor exchanges.

Key provisions and floor outcomes: - Separate ventilated smoking-room amendment: offered, widely debated and defeated. Proponents said partitions and separate ventilation could preserve choice; opponents argued the exceptions would undermine the bill’s purpose. - Truck-stop amendment: introduced as an exemption to allow smoking in truck stops; it was debated at length and failed on a standing count. - Airport smoking-room language: the Senate removed specific language allowing separate enclosed smoking areas in certain international airport terminals, an amendment that passed on the floor. - Effective-date delay: a motion to delay the bill’s effective date to July 1, 1996, was rejected by the chamber.

The final vote on HB 50 (22–6–1) was recorded on the floor and the bill will proceed to the House for further action. The transcript shows sustained floor engagement from both public-health advocates and business/ tourism concerned senators; the Senate also scheduled or circled related items for follow-up as needed.

What’s next: HB 50 was passed by the Senate and transmitted for the House’s response to Senate amendments and scheduling for any additional action.