Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Term Limits topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate enacts statutory 12‑year term limits starting 1995

Utah State Senate · March 2, 1994
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate passed a statute (first substitute House Bill 305) imposing 12‑year term limits for state officers and legislators, with the counting to begin on Jan. 1, 1995; senators voiced both constitutional and governance concerns during debate.

The Utah Senate voted to pass the first substitute to House Bill 305, the Utah Term Limitation Act, which establishes a 12‑year limit on service in specified state offices including state executive positions, state representatives and state senators. The statute begins counting service as of Jan. 1, 1995.

Senator Lane Beatty, sponsor on the floor, described the measure’s structure and the grandfathering approach. He told colleagues the bill would "start the clock" on 01/01/1995 so previous service would not count against the new 12‑year limit. Several senators spoke in opposition at length, arguing the statute may be unconstitutional and that voters already exercise limits via periodic elections. Others said polls showed strong public support for term limits and urged enactment.

The Senate moved the bill under suspension of the rules for final passage. On a recorded roll call the chamber passed the first substitute (first substitute HB305 shows 16 ayes, 11 nays, 2 absent). The Senate sent the enrolled measure to the House for further action.

Context: supporters framed the statutory approach as an alternative to or complement of a ballot constitutional amendment; opponents warned of the loss of institutional memory and argued the change could transfer influence to unelected administrators. Senator Beatty acknowledged potential legal challenges but said the statute addressed a strong public sentiment for limits.

The Senate’s action put a statutory term‑limit scheme into law pending any subsequent legal or constitutional enforcement action.