Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sales Tax Admissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate places admissions sales-tax bill on third-reading calendar after debate over ski-lift exemption
Summary
Senators debated Senate Bill 191, which would clarify sales-tax treatment for admissions (movies, amusement parks, ski lifts, pools, golf, tennis), including contested amendments to delay or exempt ski-lift taxes; after debate and failed substitute motions the bill was placed on the third-reading calendar (17–10).
The Utah Senate considered a package of sales-tax changes in Senate Bill 191 intended to clarify which admissions and recreational fees are subject to sales tax. Sponsor Senator Haven Barlow said the measure is meant to resolve uncertainty in tax commission practice and is not intended as a new tax in the same sense as a recent special-session bill.
Barlow walked senators through examples the bill would clarify: movie admissions (projected at about $2,534,000), ski-lift admissions (projected about $1,631,000), amusement-park admissions and other activities such as skating rinks, batting cages and tennis/racket-court fees. He and supporters argued the measure would help meet a portion of a roughly $55.7 million revenue target the Legislature had discussed for school-building commitments.
Opponents asked for more study. Senator Marie and others argued the state was moving the issue up a year ahead of tax-revision-commission hearings and expressed concern about economic impacts on the ski industry, especially during a period of Olympic planning. An amendment was proposed to delay the ski-lift portion until 07/01/2003; proponents of a delay said it would allow hearings and preserve competitiveness for resorts at least through the Olympic cycle. Sponsors objected, arguing the bill is intended to create an even playing field and that special treatment should be argued separately.
Senators also discussed options to limit or condition any relief to ski resorts — for example, restoring matching requirements so tax proceeds would be used for lift, snowmaking or grooming equipment — and noted the fiscal arithmetic varied depending on which items were included or excluded.
A substitute motion to delay implementation for one year was debated and failed on a voice vote. The main motion (to place the bill on the third-reading calendar) carried on roll call; the clerk reported the tally as 17 ayes, 10 nays and 2 absent. The sponsor said the bill would 'take care of' several unclear taxable categories and provide revenue toward the state's commitments; opponents said it needed more deliberation through the tax-revision process.
The session adjourned after the roll-call and routine announcements. The bill will return for third-reading consideration with the votes and amendments recorded in the day's proceedings.
