Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate approves SB 212 to shift sales-tax revenue toward water projects

Utah State Senate · February 23, 1994
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate voted to advance and pass S.B. 212, a measure to transfer a portion of sales-tax revenue to water projects aimed at supporting rural communities; the bill passed the Senate and was sent to the House for consideration.

The Utah Senate on Feb. 22 approved S.B. 212, a measure to transfer a portion of sales-tax revenue to water projects intended to support rural areas of the state. Supporters said the change would provide dedicated funding to preserve water supplies and spur growth outside the Wasatch Front.

Sen. Mitrich, speaking for the bill, urged colleagues to support the legislation “if we want some growth outside the Wasatch Front,” framing the measure as a way to preserve an earmarked share of sales tax for water infrastructure. Debate included technical questions about how the transfer would interact with other proposed revenue rescissions; senators clarified that the transfers could be combined with other planned changes, potentially removing up to $50 million from available general-purpose revenues if multiple actions were taken together.

After floor discussion and a motion to consider the bill under suspension of the rules for second and third readings, the Senate voted to advance S.B. 212 and recorded the roll call. The clerk reported the bill showed 20 ayes, 7 nays and 2 absent; the measure was ordered sent to the House for further consideration.

Senators who spoke in favor emphasized water as a scarce state resource and urged passage to provide funding for projects across Utah, including rural communities. Opponents raised concerns about interactions with other tax changes and fiscal notes but the motion to advance the bill carried. The bill’s next procedural step is consideration in the House of Representatives.

The Senate discussion took place on the floor under unfinished business and concluded with a formal roll-call vote; the bill was transmitted to the House without further action required from the Senate.