Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voter Registration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances motor-voter registration bill amid fiscal concern
Summary
Senate Bill 98, a motor-voter registration measure presented Feb. 9, 1994, was advanced after debate about federal mandates and a cited fiscal note. Sponsors called it a compliance and access measure; opponents warned of cost and federal overreach. Final recorded tally showed 15 ayes and 11 nays.
Senate Bill 98, a motor-voter registration bill presented on Feb. 9, 1994, was advanced on the Utah Senate floor after a debate that balanced access-to-registration arguments with concerns about federal mandates and state fiscal impact.
Senator Millie Peterson (presenting the committee report) characterized the bill as implementing a federal mandate intended to make registration easier and to expand registration opportunities beyond drivers-license offices. She said the measure was drafted with input from the lieutenant governors office and county clerks and described it as a broader registration bill rather than simply a motor-vehicle measure.
Opponents on the floor focused on the bills fiscal implications and on objections to what some senators described as federal mandates. A senator on the floor cited a fiscal note of roughly $733,000 in the first year and $1.4 million the following year; another senator said the proposal would place burdens on human-services offices required to offer registration assistance. A floor speaker summarized the policy tension: "It is a federal mandate, and I think that we need to be concerned about federal mandates," reflecting the view of several members who voted against advancement.
The clerk recorded a final floor tally in the transcript of 15 ayes, 11 nays and 3 absent; the bill was advanced on the calendar for further consideration.
