Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate backs rule change to centralize budgeting policy, sets limits for rainy‑day use
Summary
The Utah Senate advanced SJR 4 to give the Executive Appropriations Committee broad authority to set budget policy and revenue assumptions, add a subcommittee process for detailed allocations, and adopt a mechanism to cover small shortfalls from the budget reserve within an established percentage. Lawmakers debated membership balance, whether excess revenues should reduce bonded indebtedness, and what percentage of the rainy‑day fund may be used without a special session.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Senate voted to advance a joint rules resolution, SJR 4, that reshapes how the Legislature sets overall budget policy and gives the Executive Appropriations Committee a central role in the interim and session revenue estimates.
Senator George Manti, sponsor of SJR 4, told colleagues the resolution is intended to strike a balance between a strong centralized ways‑and‑means approach and broad legislative involvement. “What this rule says is that the Executive Appropriations Committee would make the broad policy decisions about the appropriations process that need to be made,” he said, while appropriations subcommittees would handle detailed allocations.
Supporters said the process aims to reduce end‑of‑session volatility by adopting revenue estimates before the session and setting base figures for subcommittees to follow. Opponents and some moderates pressed for safeguards: Senator Black questioned language that appeared to change the Senate’s representation on the executive committee; proponents responded that the membership remains balanced overall (nine senators and nine representatives), but internal majority/minority slots were rearranged.
A central point of contention was how the plan treats minor revenue shortfalls. Senators debated whether small shortfalls should be covered automatically from the budget reserve (the “rainy‑day” fund) or require cuts or a formal reexamination. Senator McAllister asked whether the intent was to use the rainy‑day fund for minor shortfalls; Senator Manti said the committee could refine the wording and that the committee would recommend the percentage threshold to apply. During discussion lawmakers gave examples of possible triggers (several senators noted that 1% of the budget could be on the order of $20–25 million and that the rainy‑day fund had been cited as roughly $60 million).
Other amendments and clarifications adopted on the floor include language that limits automatic rainy‑day draws to the amount of shortfall within the established percentage (as set by the Executive Appropriations Committee) and an insertion that the committee “shall consider tax collections, revenue policy, tax administration, and analysis of revenue sources, as well as others,” to preserve flexibility in review.
The Senate also discussed how excess revenues ought to be used; Senator Reese and others urged consideration of using one‑time excesses to reduce bonded indebtedness rather than increase ongoing spending. Senator Oakey cautioned that reducing bonded debt must be weighed against current borrowing costs.
Before final floor action on SJR 4, the chamber heard a revenue presentation from legislative fiscal staff, who said Utah’s economy showed strong job growth and recommended baseline funding levels and a fiscal‑note reserve to cover anticipated costs tied to bills with fiscal notes.
Under suspension of the rules the Senate read SJR 4 for the second time and placed it on the third‑reading calendar; a later roll call recorded 28 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent. The resolution now proceeds per legislative scheduling for final consideration.
Votes at a glance from this floor session: SB 8 (Board of Pardons and Parole amendments): advanced to third reading (reported 28–0); SB 10 (driver license practice permits): advanced to third reading (28–0, 1 absent); SB 55 (reviser statute): advanced (reported 29–0); SJR 2 and SR 1 likewise were advanced to third reading as reported on the floor.
