Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves package restoring sales‑tax exemptions for many recreational services, adds taxi exception
Summary
After debate about tourism, fairness and fiscal impact, the Senate passed an amended version of SB141 to reinstate certain participant‑service sales‑tax exemptions and to exempt interstate taxi movements; fiscal note updated to $5.98 million impact to the state.
The Utah Senate on Feb. 21 passed Senate Bill 141 as amended, reinstating sales‑tax exemptions for a set of participant recreational services (for example, certain golf and health‑club participation fees) and, on an amendment from Senator Stewart, adding an exemption for interstate transportation of people by taxicab.
Sponsor Senator Alaric Marine said the bill restores exemptions for ‘participant’ recreation activities and that the amended fiscal note shows a state revenue impact of $5,980,000. “With the way the bill was amended that took the amusement parts out, the fiscal note to the state is $5,980,000 now,” Marine told the chamber.
Senator Stewart argued the taxi exemption targets a narrow, low‑income user group and small, often transient, operators who are harmed by the state sales tax on cab fares. “The people that use taxis are the people who don't have cars, who are unable to afford cars, who are elderly… They're the very lowest portion of the people on the economic scale,” Stewart said, urging relief for riders and drivers.
Floor debate ranged from concerns that exempting skiing and other tourist activities would enlarge the fiscal note to arguments that keeping skiing in the exemption helps Utah compete with neighboring states and supports tourism. Senators also discussed whether the bill should be handled as a standalone bill or carry separate amendments for specific industries.
Under the final action, the Senate voted to pass SB141 as amended; the chair announced the bill passed to the House for further consideration with 25 aye votes and 3 nay votes (one absence noted). Sponsors said the House will consider the measure next, where the fiscal consequences and the scope of exemptions will receive further attention.
Next steps: SB141 will be transmitted to the House. The fiscal analyst’s estimate attached to the bill will be part of the House and conference discussions if differences arise between chambers.
