Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances substitute to election-law recodification after technical and timing amendments
Summary
The Senate accepted a first-substitute version of Senate Bill 161 (election-law technical revisions), restored portions of original language and approved an amendment moving a reporting deadline from May 10 to May 20 after Republican Party concerns about compliance timing.
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate accepted a first-substitute version of Senate Bill 161, a multi-part recodification and technical-revisions package for election law, after floor debate and targeted amendments.
Sponsor Brent Richards described the measure as the product of a multi-year technical recodification and said committee work restored original language where the committee believed changes were substantive. Richards said the substitute corrected several timing and administrative problems that would have been impossible to meet (printing schedules, county clerk timelines) and restored language to keep the package ‘‘technical’’ rather than substantive.
Late in floor debate a procedural amendment was offered to change a filing/reporting date from May 10 to May 20. Richards explained he was asked by Lorraine Pace of the Republican Party to make the change to avoid putting party officials in a position where they could be noncompliant with current deadlines. "Lorraine Pace indicates for the Republican Party...they feel that if we change from May 10 to May 20, that they can comply with the law," he said. The chamber adopted the change.
The Senate voted to accept the first substitute and moved the bill to third reading. Senators noted the bill arose from an interim task force and volunteers who worked for four years to recodify complex election statutes.
What happens next: The bill will be considered on third reading; additional technical adjustments could follow if clerks or county officials identify implementation timing issues.
