Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves $90 million property-tax cut, drawing sharp debate over long-term impact
Summary
The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 254 on Feb. 24, 1995, approving a package the sponsors described as a roughly $90 million property-tax reduction for the year and changes to the minimum school levy; opponents warned the changes risk long-term revenue erosion. The bill passed by roll call and was sent to the House.
The Utah State Senate on Feb. 24 voted to pass Senate Bill 254, a measure leaders said would deliver about $90 million in property-tax relief for the year and adjust the minimum school levy framework.
Senator Blackcomb, a sponsor on the floor, described the bill’s mechanics: “Basically, this bill gives the $90,000,000 tax cut,” and he said the measure floats the rate for the taxing year to prevent a windfall and directs utilities be held harmless as the state balances reductions across tax bases.
The bill drew sustained questioning over its fiscal scope and consequences. Senator Mantis objected sharply, saying, “The rate at which we are decimating the state's tax structure frightens me to death,” and warned that successive tax cuts could undermine long-term revenue. Senator Montgomery urged caution about interactions with the factoring order and reassessed values, noting that with the factoring order and reassessments the net effect might be smaller than advertised: under some scenarios he said there could be only “a 4% … reduction of property taxes throughout the state.”
Sponsors and supporters said the language provides a one‑year floating of the rate to avoid windfalls and that companion house measures would address permanent changes; they also said the bill includes notice language so property owners can see the savings attributed to legislative action on their tax notices.
Under suspension of the rules, the Senate called the question and took a roll‑call vote. The clerk reported the final tally as 19 ayes and 10 nays on the motion to pass SB 254 as amended; the measure passed and was transmitted to the House for further consideration.
What happens next: The bill moves to the House for consideration and potential concurrence or amendment; senators who opposed the bill said they expect continued debate on budget priorities and long-term fiscal strategy.
Votes and formal action: The Senate recorded a roll‑call vote on Feb. 24, 1995, approving SB 254 (motion to pass as amended) by 19–10. The sponsor recorded on the floor as moving the bill was Senator Blackcomb; the clerk recorded the passing and transmittal to the House.
