Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Labor topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate Approves Bill Barring Local Project-Labor Requirements After Contentious Debate

Utah Senate · February 17, 1995
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 137, which would prohibit local governments from imposing predetermined wages or project labor agreements on public works projects except where federal law requires them, passed after a robust floor debate on labor policy and economic impact studies.

The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 137 on third-reading calendar after a heated floor exchange over whether local governments should be allowed to require predetermined wages or project labor agreements on public works projects.

Sponsor Senator McAllister and supporters said the bill protects municipalities from costly litigation and creates consistent procurement standards across jurisdictions; they argued it upholds the 1981 repeal of prevailing-wage law and prevents local governments from imposing uneven requirements. "We're attempting again to continue the action taken in 1981 ... to repeal the Minnie Davis-Bacon Act," the sponsor said while urging passage.

Opponents, led by Senator Maine, cited recent economic analysis from the University of Utah suggesting that repeal of prevailing-wage laws reduced construction earnings, cost the state in tax revenue, and increased cost overruns on state road projects. Maine called the proposal "blatantly unconstitutional" and said the attorney general was researching the issue ahead of third reading.

The Senate called and held a roll-call vote; the presiding officer announced the result as 17 aye votes and 11 nay votes with one absence, advancing SB137 on the calendar.

Lawmakers on both sides emphasized the stakes for large-scale projects, public procurement and union and nonunion contractors; the debate pointed to further legal review and possible future litigation before the measure would have final effect.