Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Entity Advocacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes limits on public‑entity advocacy after contested PTA amendment fails
Summary
Senate Bill 27, restricting public‑entity advocacy on ballot issues, passed after floor amendments clarifying 'influence' were adopted; a narrowly drawn amendment to allow PTAs to distribute issue flyers to students' homes without public funds was debated and defeated.
The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 27 on Feb. 1, 1995, establishing limits on when public entities or officials may "influence" ballot propositions and clarifying that providing information about a governmental unit’s position and reasons is not itself prohibited.
Sponsor Senator Stevenson said amendments negotiated with local governments define "influence" as "to campaign or advocate for or against a ballot proposition" while allowing governmental units to provide factual information and the reasons for their position. The amended language was placed on the bill and accepted by the body.
A substantial floor fight followed over a narrowly drawn amendment from Senator Hilliard that would have allowed Parent Teacher Associations (PTAs) to disseminate issue‑position flyers to parents via students (so long as no public funds were used). Senator Stevenson, Senator Bolton and others opposed the amendment, saying it would give PTAs privileged access to captive student audiences and could create an unfair advantage for one side on ballot issues. Senator Hilliard and supporters argued PTAs are volunteer organizations representing parents and that the amendment merely protected their ability to inform parents without using public funds.
The Senate put Hilliard’s amendment to a standing count; it failed. Debate on the floor repeatedly returned to the need to prevent the use of public funds for political advocacy while preserving legitimate informational activity by school or local officials and volunteer organizations. Senators asked whether student newspapers, PTA flyers, or school newsletters would be affected; sponsors clarified the bill does not curtail student First Amendment rights in school newspapers and focuses on governmental unit advocacy using public funds.
Vote and outcome: After the debate and adoption of the sponsor’s clarifying amendment, the Senate recorded a roll‑call vote: SB 27 passed 17–11 with 1 absent and will be transmitted to the House for further consideration.
Ending: The bill proceeds to the House. The transcript records senators’ concerns about captive audiences, fairness in dissemination, and how to balance protecting public funds from political use while allowing citizens’ volunteer organizations to communicate positions.
Speakers quoted in this article include Senator Stevenson (sponsor) and Senator Hilliard (proposed PTA exception). Their remarks are taken from the Feb. 1, 1995 Senate transcript.
