Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves substitute to boost state support for local school leeway; funding left to appropriators
Summary
The Senate passed a substitute to SB19 intended to guarantee a minimum yield per weighted pupil unit for local voted and board leeway, citing a first-year fiscal note of about $2.385 million and potential multi-year growth depending on district participation; funding will be resolved in the appropriations process.
The Utah Senate on Jan. 30 approved first substitute Senate Bill 19, a measure to increase state guarantees for local school districts' voted and board leeway. Sponsor Senator Howard A. Stevenson described the substitute as an effort to reduce wide disparities in per-student revenue that result from differences in local tax bases.
Stevenson said the substitute guarantees roughly $12 per weighted pupil unit for the first mill and phases in expanded guarantees over several years, with indexing tied to the weighted pupil unit. "The intent of this legislation is to ensure that when the voters in those districts commit to increase their own taxes ... we as a state will guarantee that they get a certain minimum amount of money for each of the mills that they generate," Stevenson said on the floor.
Floor debate focused on equity and fiscal implications. Senators asked about immediate and long-term costs; the sponsor and fiscal analysts cited a first-year fiscal note of approximately $2,385,000 and indicated long-term costs depend on how many districts choose to levy the available mills. One senator said the bill could result in multi-year fiscal impacts that range significantly depending on district take-up; estimates cited during the debate ranged from a modest multi-year increase up to figures in the low tens of millions if many districts opt in.
Senator Taylor and other supporters said the bill is not a "Robin Hood" redistribution that would take money from any district; rather, it guarantees additional state support when local taxpayers approve higher levies. Opponents pressed on funding sources and whether the guaranteed increases could be sustained without offsetting reductions elsewhere in the uniform school fund.
After debate the Senate recorded the vote as 28 aye, no nay votes and 1 absent and passed the substitute to the bottom of the third-reading calendar. Stevenson emphasized that passage does not itself appropriate funds and that the measure will need to compete in the appropriations process for actual funding.
The outcome entrusts the State Board of Education and appropriators with determining how funding is provided and how the phased indexation will be implemented.
