Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxes Sales topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances bill narrowing roadside-stand sales-tax exemption despite objections
Summary
Senate debate over SB 43 centered on narrowing a longstanding sales-tax exemption for seasonal roadside agricultural sales; sponsor said the change clarifies intent and yields a $275,000 fiscal note, opponents warned it risks taxing processing inputs and creating administrative confusion. The amendment to preserve processing exemptions failed and SB 43 passed second reading 18–11.
Senate President Beatty presided as senators debated Senate Bill 43, which narrows an agricultural sales-tax exemption for seasonal roadside stands and limits the exemption to "locally produced" goods, excluding certain processing inputs.
Senator Hilliard, sponsor of SB 43, told the Senate the bill "narrows the exemption to what we think it was originally intended to be" and said the change was approved by the tax revenue and tax review committees. He noted a fiscal note of about $275,000 tied to the change. "What this bill does again is it narrows the exemption," Hilliard said, citing committee agreement and stakeholder input from the Farm Bureau and grocers' association.
Opponents pressed that the language risks shifting exemption determinations from the Legislature to the courts and could tax inputs used in processing. "The legislature ought to be setting policy, not the court," Senator Stevenson said during floor debate, arguing that removing the processing-language could create litigation and administrative uncertainty. Senator Moran and others questioned where the line between production and processing would be drawn in practice; Moran asked whether sprays used in storage would remain exempt.
On the floor Hilliard objected to delaying the policy choice and said the committee narrowed the exemption deliberately to preserve the statute’s integrity. Opponents countered that the bill, as amended in committee, marked a substantive tax increase compared with existing case law. Stevenson and Senator Stevenson (floor participants) said the change "pulls back" a court interpretation and represented a legislative policy choice.
A floor amendment offered by Senator Stevenson that would have replaced the new language with the word "including" (explicitly keeping sprays and insecticides used in processing within the exemption) was moved, debated, and put to a standing division. The amendment failed on the floor after the division vote.
The Senate then proceeded to a roll-call on SB 43 as amended. The clerk recorded 18 "Aye" votes and 11 "No" votes. The presiding officer announced that SB 43 passed second reading and was placed on the third-reading calendar for further consideration.
The Senate record shows the debate focused on balancing a narrow exemption for small, seasonal local producers with fairness to established retailers and clarity for tax administration. Next steps: SB 43 will appear on the third-reading calendar for final passage consideration.
