Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate fiscal analyst reports stronger-than-expected revenues, outlines budget priorities
Summary
Fiscal analyst Leo Mamet told the Senate that updated revenue estimates show increased general-fund and uniform-school-fund receipts and presented building-block budget priorities, flagging corrections and juvenile services as pressure points and leaving a $15.5M reserve.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Leo Mamet, the legislature's fiscal analyst, presented updated revenue estimates and a budget framework to the Utah Senate on Jan. 16, reporting stronger-than-expected growth in several revenue streams and outlining priority spending categories for the 1995–96 budget.
Mamet said the state's economy remains strong: Utah led the nation in job-creation growth in 1994 and maintained low unemployment (about 3.7% in 1994). He told senators that the general fund estimate increased by $29.5 million above January's estimate and that the uniform school fund estimate rose by $32.3 million. For fiscal 1996 he cited a general-fund estimate of $1,287,400,000 and a uniform school fund projection of $1,222,700,000.
Mamet described a "building blocks" approach for expenditures so committees and subcommittees can select continuation costs, mandates, enrollment growth, program continuation, compensation reserves and program enhancements. He said $15.5 million in additional revenue above the governor's estimates was held in reserve rather than recommended for immediate expenditure.
He identified major pressure points on the spending side: corrections (adult and juvenile facilities), growth in children's services tied to a recent court case (which he said would require an estimated $37.5 million increase in the governor's budget for youth services), and enrollment-driven increases for public education and higher education. He stressed that subcommittees and the executive appropriations committee would determine final allocations.
After the briefing, senators asked clarifying questions about reserves, compensation assumptions (a 4% package held in reserve), treatment of tax commission factoring orders and the timeline for executive-appropriations decisions. Mamet said the estimates did not include newly issued factoring orders by the tax commission and emphasized the committee-based decision process for final budget choices.
The Senate recorded appreciation for the briefing; the executive appropriations committee was scheduled to meet the next day to set spending levels.
