Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Welfare Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves child-welfare funding and attorney fees after heated debate in special session
Summary
The Utah Senate passed House Bill 7, combining court-mandated attorney-fee payments and accelerated hiring funds for child-welfare caseworkers, amid objections over special-session timing and budget priorities; the bill passed 20–6 with 3 absent after a failed motion to reconsider.
The Utah Senate on April 19 approved House Bill 7, a special-session appropriation that funds court-mandated attorney fees and accelerates hiring of child-welfare caseworkers, following extended debate over whether the Legislature should spend in a special session.
Senators voted 20 in favor, 6 opposed and 3 absent to pass the bill. A subsequent motion to reconsider the action failed, leaving the appropriation in place and the bill referred back to the House for final signature and enrolling.
Supporters said the measure was necessary to meet court requirements and to reduce interest and further litigation. Senator Peters argued that caseloads have expanded rapidly: “We have gone from 1,400 children in foster care a year ago to 1,800 children,” a point sponsors used to justify early hires and operational support. Sponsors described a package of roughly $1.0–1.1 million that included (as discussed on the floor) approximately $335,000 for early hiring costs, about $200,000 to pay early months’ salaries before July 1, $35,000 for communications equipment, and roughly $625,000 intended for attorney fees handled through the Office of the Attorney General.
Opponents said the timing and scope were wrong for a special session. Senator Tanner said he would vote against paying the attorney fees before the Legislature had addressed other outstanding obligations, specifically citing unpaid attorney fees owed to the University of Utah. "Until we take care of our obligations for the University of Utah, I don't feel good about voting for these attorney's fees," Tanner said on the floor.
Proponents repeatedly cited legal risk and potential interest costs if the state delayed payment. Senators noted language in the bill and referenced the David C. v. Levitt settlement as background for obligations discussed during debate. After a period of questions and a motion to recall the vote, the motion failed and the original passage stood.
The immediate effect: the administration can proceed with accelerated hiring and the attorney-fee payments described in the bill; funding was designated as nonlapsing in portions of the bill. The sponsors said further program details and implementation steps would be handled by the executive branch departments responsible for child welfare and by the Office of the Attorney General.
The Senate moved next to other business and later confirmed a slate of gubernatorial appointments before adjourning.
