Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Welfare Reform topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances welfare-to-work bill, elevates SPED pilot statewide

Utah State Senate · February 26, 1996
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate moved House Bill 293 (Employment Assistance for Utah Families) forward after floor debate that emphasized statutory expansion of the SPED pilot, individualized employment plans and time-limited participation; some senators sought additional protections for training length, childcare and health care.

The Senate placed House Bill 293 on the third-reading calendar after an extended floor presentation and debate on Feb. 26. Senator Nathan C. Tanner, who described the bill as converting a pilot program (SPED) to statewide statute, said the measure focuses on self-reliance by requiring employment plans and time-limited participation for beneficiaries.

"Bottom line, this turns welfare and entitlements into a plan that helps people train themselves to live in the workaday world and succeed in that world," Tanner said, summarizing the bill’s goals. The statute would require recipients to complete a good-faith employment plan with the Office of Family Support and, after time on assistance, to participate in work activities designed to build employability.

Several senators applauded the SPED model but raised concerns about fixed time limits (for example, training programs that require multi-year coursework such as electricians’ apprenticeships), the availability of child care and health care coverage for participants, and whether the program would produce jobs paying a living wage. Senator Mayne asked for assurances that health care, childcare and housing support would be available to make the transition feasible; Senator Steiner said he might propose amendments to add protections for circumstances such as job loss or illness.

Senators agreed to move the first substitute to the third-reading calendar for further consideration; floor announcements signaled amendments and detailed deliberations would continue during the next day’s session.