Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate backs narrower window‑tinting rule for sport-utility vehicles after safety debate
Summary
Senate Bill 112, aligning state rules with federal standards for factory-installed darkening behind drivers’ heads (targeting sport-utility vehicles), passed after floor discussion about officer visibility, motor homes and federal conformity; recorded as 24–0 with five absent.
The Utah Senate approved Senate Bill 112 on Feb. 16, a measure adjusting state law on motor-vehicle window tinting to account for factory-installed tint on certain sport-utility and similar vehicles. Sponsors said the change mirrors federal rules and addresses constituents who had their vehicles failed in inspection because factory tint differed from administrative rules. The roll call recorded 24 ayes, no nays and five members absent.
Senator Brent Richards and Senator David Steele explained the bill’s scope: it does not alter tint limits for passenger cars but addresses vehicles that carry factory-installed darker glazing behind the driver’s head—commonly some sport‑utility vehicles, buses, trucks or vans as defined by administrative rule. The bill delegates authority to the Department of Public Safety to define the listed motor-vehicle types administratively so enforcement aligns with federal standards.
Opponents and questioners raised concerns about whether motor homes, foreign cars or other vehicles might be covered, and emphasized officer safety and the need for clear statutory definitions. Senator Howell and others asked the department to clarify the definitions; proponents said public-safety input (the Highway Patrol) was part of negotiations. Senator Steele described the bill as a response to a practical problem of vehicles leaving factories with tint that did not match the existing administrative standard and noted that the legislation intends to avoid forcing consumers to remove factory glazing.
The Senate adopted a short amendment to clarify which vehicles were being added and directed administrative rulemaking for detailed definitions; the measure passed by roll-call and was placed at the bottom of the third‑reading calendar for enrollment and transmission.
Quote: “We just kind of got together and felt that this was needed to be done,” Senator Richards said, summarizing negotiations with public-safety officials. Senator Steele emphasized public-safety concerns and adherence to federal standards.
Next steps recorded in the transcript: the bill will proceed through the formal enrollment and transmittal process; no fiscal note was highlighted in the floor debate. Implementation will depend on the department’s rulemaking to define vehicle classes accurately.
