Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances bill to protect subcontractors’ access to financing information; SB 152 moves forward
Summary
SB 152, sponsored by Sen. Reese, seeks to limit the impact of 'pay-if-paid' clauses by reaffirming subcontractors’ lien rights and allowing them to request project financing information when contingent-payment clauses apply. After floor debate about private-contract limits, the Senate voted to advance the bill to third reading (26–2).
The Senate advanced SB 152 on Feb. 19, 1996 after debate about balancing protections between general contractors and subcontractors on projects where payment is contingent.
Senator Reese, sponsor, said the bill responds to commercial contracting practices that leave subcontractors unpaid when an owner does not pay the general contractor. He described committee negotiations that produced a compromise requiring, among other provisions, that where contingent "pay-if-paid" clauses are used a subcontractor may request financial information about project financing from the contractor or owner. Reese said the bill reaffirms subcontractors’ lien rights and provides a limited transparency tool for subcontractors to assess payment risk.
Opponents asked about the bill’s reach into private contracting and about an exclusion for certain private-property contracts. Senator Hilliard expressed concern about legislative intrusion on private contract rights; Reese defended the measure as a common legislative role to ensure fairness in construction markets. The Senate called the question and, on roll call, SB 152 received 26 yeas, 2 nays, and 1 absent and was moved to the third‑reading calendar.
Senators said the bill was the result of multiple committee meetings and negotiation with industry participants; sponsors reported support from both general contractors and subcontractors for the compromise language. The measure as advanced requires further review on third reading and implementation details such as what financial disclosures will be required would be clarified in final drafting.
