Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recreation Wildlife topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate debates camping restrictions to protect scarce water sources; bill amended on floor

Utah State Senate · February 16, 1996
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate debated House Bill 188, which would bar camping near limited water sources to protect wildlife and livestock. Lawmakers questioned the original 400-yard requirement, the geographic scope (desert vs. mountain), and enforcement; amendments narrowed and clarified the measure before it passed the floor for enrollment.

The Utah Senate spent a large portion of its Friday session debating House Bill 188, a measure that would restrict camping near certain water sources to protect livestock and wildlife.

Representative Gallant’s bill as introduced would bar camping within defined distances of waterholes used by animals in areas where access is limited. Sponsors and supporters told colleagues the restriction is intended primarily for arid or desert locations with a single water trough or spring, not the mountain areas with abundant water. "If you're out in the desert and there's only one water hole and you're gonna deny access to that waterhole, then you better camp 400 yards away," said Senator Marine during floor debate, urging lawmakers to preserve watering access for game and livestock.

Opponents and questioners raised practical and enforcement concerns. Senators asked whether the rule would apply on private land, how signs or designations would be determined, and whether the original 400-yard limit (equal to roughly 1,200 feet) was disproportionately large for many mountain and recreational settings. Senator Wharton and others said routine backcountry use—hikers and small groups pitching a tent beside a lake—should not be criminalized. "I don't get it," a senator said in expressing concern about criminalizing ordinary campers when water is abundant nearby.

On the floor, senators offered multiple amendments to narrow the scope and to clarify that the restriction applies only in arid areas with limited water. Lawmakers also debated and adopted a motion reducing the buffer distance and tested alternative yardages (200 and 100 yards) before agreeing on amended language. Sponsors said the amendments were intended to reflect the bill’s original intent and to avoid punishing ordinary mountain campers.

The bill drew extended floor questioning about enforcement (the bill carried a misdemeanor penalty), exceptions for elderly or mobility-impaired visitors, and the definition of "limited water sources." Senators asked the Department of Transportation and other agencies for lists of impacted sites and for prioritization information.

After debate, roll call votes were taken on amendments and on final passage; the Senate recorded the result and the bill was placed for final processing and filing. The amended measure will proceed through the enrollment and signature process before returning to the House for final action.

Next steps: the bill passed the Senate floor as amended and will be filed and transmitted for further action per standard enrollment procedures.